Shared Decision-making in Breast Cancer Reconstructive Surgery: Experience in a Leading Hospital

Author:

Herrera de la Muela María1,Sanz Medrano Santiago2,Leyva Francisco3,Masa Jurado Inmaculada2,Membrilla Ortiz Ana I.1,Brenes Sánchez Juana1,de la Puente Yagüe Miriam1,Ruiz Rodríguez Jorge1,Buendía Pérez Javier2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain

2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain

3. Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, La Paz Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

Background: The paradigm of healthcare has evolved toward patient-centered approaches, where shared decision-making (SDM) plays a pivotal role. This study aimed to explore the implementation of SDM during breast cancer reconstruction consultations and assess its impact on patient satisfaction and the decision-making process as a whole. Methods: A total of 102 female patients undergoing breast reconstruction were included in a multidisciplinary breast pathology unit. A streamlined SDM model involving choice introduction, option description, and preference exploration was implemented. A validated Spanish version of the nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire was used alongside a complementary questionnaire. Data analysis was carried out using electronic data capture software. Results: The nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire results indicate strong agreement in presenting various options and explaining their advantages and disadvantages. Patients were less confident about their participation in decision-making. The Complementary Shared Decision Making Questionnaire highlighted high satisfaction with interview times and language clarity but areas for improvement in consultation space and therapeutic choice participation. Conclusions: Integrating SDM into breast reconstruction consultations empowers patients in the decision-making process and enhances satisfaction. Decision aids prove effective in this context, facilitating patients’ comprehension and reducing decisional conflict. There are areas for improvement within the SDM strategy, and they are detectable through scales. Although challenges in information transmission and patient involvement persist, adopting an SDM model has potential benefits that warrant further investigation.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference15 articles.

1. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS.;Elwyn;BMJ,2010

2. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.;Elwyn;J Gen Intern Med,2012

3. Feasibility and efficacy of decision aids to improve decision making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.;Berlin;Med Decis Making,2019

4. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample.;Kriston;Patient Educ Couns,2010

5. Validación de Shared Decision Making Questionnaire—physician version (SDM-Q-Doc) en español.;Navarrete Floriano;Rev Clín Med Fam,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3