Instructional Video of a Standardized Interprofessional Postsimulation Facilitator-guided Debriefing of a Fatality in Plastic Surgery

Author:

Gasteratos Konstantinos1,Michalopoulos James2,Nona Marven3,Morsi-Yeroyiannis Antonios4,Goverman Jeremy5,Rakhorst Hinne6,van der Hulst René R. W. J.7

Affiliation:

1. Formerly of Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, N.Y.

2. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Greece

3. Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada

4. Department of General Surgery, Hippokrateio General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

5. Summer M. Redstone Burn Center, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.

6. Department of Plastic Surgery, MST Enschede, ZGT Almelo, the Netherlands

7. Department of Plastic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Abstract

Background: Postsimulation facilitator-guided debriefing (PSFGD) is the process of intentional discussion of thoughts, actions, and events that took place during simulation amongst the facilitator(s) and trainees. Despite the significance of delivering high-quality debriefings, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines. Our study aimed to provide an instructional video demonstration of a PSFGD of a fatality. Methods: Fifty surgical interns participated in a burn simulation scenario in two groups. Group 1 (control, or “no exposure,” n = 25) consisted of residents who received oral postsimulation debriefing from an independent faculty member who had no exposure to our instructional video on how to debrief effectively. Group 2 (intervention, or “exposure,” n = 25) consisted of interns who were debriefed by the second faculty member who did watch our instructional video before the simulation and learned about “advocacy and inquiry” techniques. The outcome measures were the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare score and the postdebrief multiple-choice question (MCQ) quiz scores to assess debriefers’ performance and interns’ knowledge consolidation, respectively. Results: The “exposure” group presented statistically significantly higher values for the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare score (P < 0.001) and MCQ score (P < 0.001) compared with the “no exposure” group. Conclusions: Debriefers who followed the methodology as demonstrated in our instructional video were considered more competent, and the residents achieved higher MCQ scores. The quality of the debriefing ensures improved critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Safer practice and better patient outcomes are achieved by developing debriefing programs for educators.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference47 articles.

1. More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods.;Sawyer;Simul Healthc,2016

2. A pause for reflection: incorporating reflection into surgical training.;McGlinn;Ann Plast Surg,2014

3. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties.;Brett-Fleegler;Simul Healthc,2012

4. There is no such thing as non-judgemental debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgement.;Rudolph;Simul Healthc,2006

5. The impact of a high fidelity simulation-based debriefing course on the debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare (DASH) score of novice.;Tanoubi;J Adv Med Educ Prof,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3