Fat Necrosis in Single Perforator Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery and Superficial Epigastric Artery Perforator Free Flaps: A Prospective Randomized Study

Author:

Miller Rebecca L.R.1,Nguyen Christopher M.1,Peters Blair R.1,Sigurdson Leif1,Hayakawa Thomas E.J.1,Spiwak Rae2,Dalke Kimberly1,Buchel Edward W.1

Affiliation:

1. Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

2. Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Abstract

Background: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the standard of care in autologous breast reconstruction. The superficial inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (SIEA) is an alternative reconstructive option, with the compromise of less donor-site morbidity but variable perfusion to subscarpal fat zones. Fat necrosis is a known complication from marginal perfusion variability. Volumetric analysis of fat necrosis has not been performed between the two reconstructive options, nor has the amount of flap necrosis following radiation. Our objective was to compare rates and volume of fat necrosis between single-perforator DIEP and SIEA flap techniques. Methods: A single-center, blinded, prospective cohort study of patients randomized between SIEA and DIEP breast reconstruction was conducted over 2 years (June 2011–July 2013). Inclusion criteria were women undergoing immediate reconstruction following mastectomy. Randomization protocols were strictly followed. Fat necrosis volumetric analysis was determined by an ultrasound-trained attending surgeon at 12 months postoperatively. Patient demographics and adjuvant/neoadjuvant cancer treatment were analyzed. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests, chi square, and/or Fisher exact tests. P values of 0.05 or less were considered significant. Results: Fat necrosis was detected in 11 of 46 flaps (23.9%), with a median area of 17.9 cm2. There was no significant difference in prevalence of fat necrosis between the two flap types (P = 0.19). Postoperative radiation did not increase the prevalence (P = 0.30) or extent (P = 0.92) of fat necrosis. Conclusion: Single-perforator DIEP and SIEA flaps have comparable rates of fat necrosis. Postoperative radiation did not result in increased prevalence or extent of fat necrosis.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference33 articles.

1. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap.;Healy;J Reconstr Microsurg,2014

2. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle.;Koshima;Br J Plast Surg,1989

3. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications.;Taylor;Br J Plast Surg,1987

4. The venous territories (venosomes) of the human body: experimental study and clinical implications.;Taylor;Plast Reconstr Surg,1990

5. The perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications.;Saint-Cyr;Plast Reconstr Surg,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3