Value of Coronary Sinus During Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography for Predicting Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Author:

Zhang Chuang1,Xin Qian1,Xu Hongling2,Wang Xiangyu1,Yan Zhiqiang3,Sun Shengtao4,Shi Xiangmin1,Tian Mei3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, The Sixth Medical Center of People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China

2. Department of Cardiology, The Eighth Medical Center of People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100091, China

3. Department of Radiology, The Eighth Medical Center of People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100091, China

4. Department of Radiology, The Sixth Medical Center of People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.

Abstract

Objective: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) parameters are valuable for predicting pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). However, few studies have used the coronary sinus ostium area (CSOA), derived from CTPA, to detect PH. This study aimed to compare the prognostic values of the CSOA, coronary sinus ostium diameter (CSOD), and right ventricular (RV)/left ventricular (LV) ratio for PH. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 78 patients (mean age, (51.94 ± 12.33) years; 53.8% male) with acute PE confirmed by CTPA at the Sixth and Eighth Medical Centers of the People’s Liberation Army General Hospital between June 2018 and June 2020. Patients were categorized into 2 groups using a pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) cut-off of 30 mmHg. CTPA parameters were compared between these groups. Results: Patients with PASP >30 mmHg (n = 22) had a larger CSOA, CSOD, RV diameter, RV/LV ratio, and inferior vena cava diameter compared with patients with PASP ≤30 mmHg (n = 56). The CSOA had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC, 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74–0.94; P < 0.001) similar to that of the RV/LV ratio (AUC, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.73–0.99; P < 0.001), while that of the CSOD was smaller (AUC, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.51–0.81; P < 0.05). Conclusion: Both CSOA and CSOD demonstrated a good ability to predict PH, while CSOA better predicted PASP >30 mmHg.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3