Outcomes Associated with Concomitant Lower-Limb Amputation in Persons with Major Upper-Limb Amputation: Results of a National Study

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The challenges faced by persons with amputations are amplified for those with multiple limb loss, compared with single limb loss. However, there is limited research describing the functional outcomes of mixed upper and lower limb loss or the long-term psychosocial and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes among this group. Materials and Methods A cross-sectional, national telephone survey of 808 US veterans with major upper-limb amputation (ULA) with and without concomitant lower-limb amputation (LLA) who received care at US Veterans Affairs Medical Centers between 2010 and 2015 was conducted. T-tests and χ2 tests identified any significant differences in characteristics and outcomes of groups with and without LLA. Linear regressions examined the association between amputation laterality and outcomes. Results In comparison to those with no LLA, respondents with concomitant LLA were slightly younger (60.0 vs. 63.7) and had similar mean time in years from initial amputation (31.5 vs. 31.4). Transfemoral was the most common level of LLA (67.7%), and there was no significant difference in the distribution of ULA levels between the 2 groups. Phantom pain was less common among those with concomitant LLA compared with ULA only (64.4% vs. 74.5%, P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in prevalence of residual limb, neck, or back pain; measures of disability (QuickDASH); HRQoL; or need for activities of daily living help across the two groups. Conclusions In veterans with concomitant LLA and ULA, transfemoral amputation was the most common level of LLA. Those with concomitant LLA were less likely to report phantom limb pain. No statistically significant differences were found by group in need for ADL help, disability, or HRQoL. Clinical Relevance These results provide clinicians with a greater appreciation of the similarities and differences between the two groups in relation to amputation characteristics, pain, prosthesis utilization, prosthesis satisfaction, and functional outcomes.