Belgian Recommendations for Analytical Verification and Validation of Immunohistochemical Tests in Laboratories of Anatomic Pathology

Author:

Verbeke Hannelien1,Van Hecke Donald2,Bauraing Caroline3,Dierick Anne Marie1,Colleye Orphal4,Dalle Ignace2,Dewachter Kathleen5,Guiot Yves6,Lequeu Raphael3,Vanderheyden Nancy7,Zwaenepoel Karen8,Croes Romaric9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Quality of laboratories, Sciensano

2. Laboratory of Anatomic Pathology, AZ St. Lucas, Bruges

3. Institute of Anatomic Pathology and Genetics, Gosselies

4. Laboratory of Anatomic Pathology, CHU Liège, Liège

5. Laboratory of Anatomic Pathology, AZ St. Maarten, Mechelen

6. Laboratory of Anatomic Pathology, Université Catholique Louvain, Brussels

7. Laboratory of Anatomic Pathology, UZ Leuven, Leuven

8. Laboratory of Anatomic Pathology, UZ Antwerp, Antwerp

9. Laboratory of Anatomic Pathology, AZ St. Blasius, Dendermonde, Belgium

Abstract

Analytical verification and validation of immunohistochemical (IHC) tests and their equipment are common practices for today’s anatomic pathology laboratories. Few references or guidelines are available on how this should be performed. The study of Sciensano (the Belgian national competent authority regarding licensing of medical laboratories) performed in 2016, demonstrated a significant interlaboratory variation in validation procedures of IHC tests among Belgian laboratories. These results suggest the unavailability of practical information on the approach to the verification and validation of these tests. The existing Belgian Practice Guideline for the implementation of a quality management system in anatomic pathology laboratories has been reviewed to meet this demand and, in addition, to prepare the laboratories for the EU—IVD revised regulations (IVDR). This paper describes Belgian recommendations for the verification and validation of IHC tests before implementation, for ongoing validation, and for revalidation. For each type of test (according to the IVDR classification and the origin) and its intended use (purpose), it addresses how to perform analytical verification/validation by recommending: (1) the number of cases in the validation set, (2) the performance characteristics to be evaluated, (3) the objective acceptance criteria, (4) the evaluation method for the obtained results, and (5) how and when to revalidate. A literature study and a risk analysis taking into account the majority of variables regarding verification/validation of methods have been performed, resulting in an expert consensus recommendation that is a compromise among achievability, affordability, and patient safety. This new consensus recommendation has been incorporated in the aforementioned ISO 15189:2012–based Practice Guideline.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Histology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3