Efficacy and Safety of Standard Corneal Cross-Linking Procedures Performed With Short Versus Standard Riboflavin Induction: A Save Sight Keratoconus Registry Study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Efficacy and Safety of Standard Corneal Cross-Linking Procedures Performed With Short Versus Standard Riboflavin Induction: A Save Sight Keratoconus Registry Study

Published:2022-05-12 Issue:3 Volume:42 Page:326-331
ISSN:0277-3740
Container-title:Cornea
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Benito-Pascual Blanca,Kandel Himal,Abbondanza Marco,Mills Richard,Sullivan Laurence,Watson Stephanie L.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Ophthalmology

Reference33 articles.

1. Keratoconus;Rabinowitz;Surv Ophthalmol.,1998

2. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases;Gomes;Cornea,2015

3. Measurement of quality of life in keratoconus;Kandel;Cornea,2020

5. Psychometric properties of the keratoconus outcomes research questionnaire (KORQ): a Save Sight Keratoconus Registry study;Kandel;Cornea,2020

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pulsed corneal crosslinking in the treatment of Keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology;2024-08-31

2. The Chinese keratoconus (CKC) cohort study;European Journal of Epidemiology;2024-05-04

3. Mental Health Impact of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review;Cornea;2023-05-12

4. Cross-Linking Improves the Quality of Life of People With Keratoconus: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study From the Save Sight Keratoconus Registry;Cornea;2022-12-12

5. Five‐year corneal cross‐linking outcomes: A Save Sight Keratoconus Registry Study;Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology;2022-10-24