A Randomized Clinical Trial of Bayesian-Guided Beta-Lactam Infusion Strategy and Associated Bacterial Resistance and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Severe Pneumonia

Author:

Maranchick Nicole F.12,Trillo-Alvarez Cesar3,Kariyawasam Vidhu4,Venugopalan Veena25,Kwara Awewura4,Rand Kenneth6,Peloquin Charles A.12,Alshaer Mohammad H.12

Affiliation:

1. Infectious Disease Pharmacokinetics Lab, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida;

2. Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida;

3. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida;

4. Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; and

5. Department of Pharmacy, UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, Florida;

6. College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing health concern worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of beta-lactam infusion on the emergence of bacterial resistance in patients with severe pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Methods: Adult intensive care patients receiving cefepime, meropenem, or piperacillin–tazobactam for severe pneumonia caused by Gram-negative bacteria were randomized to receive beta-lactams as an intermittent (30 minutes) or continuous (24 hours) infusion. Respiratory samples for culture and susceptibility testing, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), were collected once a week for up to 4 weeks. Beta-lactam plasma concentrations were measured and therapeutic drug monitoring was performed using Bayesian software as the standard of care. Results: The study was terminated early owing to slow enrollment. Thirty-five patients were enrolled in this study. Cefepime (n = 22) was the most commonly prescribed drug at randomization, followed by piperacillin (n = 8) and meropenem (n = 5). Nineteen patients were randomized into the continuous infusion arm and 16 into the intermittent infusion arm. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common respiratory isolate (n = 19). Eighteen patients were included in the final analyses. No differences in bacterial resistance were observed between arms (P = 0.67). No significant differences in superinfection (P = 1), microbiological cure (P = 0.85), clinical cure at day 7 (P = 0.1), clinical cure at end of therapy (P = 0.56), mortality (P = 1), intensive care unit length of stay (P = 0.37), or hospital length of stay (P = 0.83) were observed. Achieving 100% ƒT > MIC (P = 0.04) and ƒT > 4 × MIC (P = 0.02) increased likelihood of clinical cure at day 7 of therapy. Conclusions: No differences in the emergence of bacterial resistance or clinical outcomes were observed between intermittent and continuous infusions. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment may be associated with a clinical cure on day 7.

Funder

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3