Limited Sampling Strategy Using End of Infusion and Six-Hour Concentrations Overestimates Intravenous Busulfan Clearance Compared With Standard Six-Point Sampling in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Author:

Salman Bushra Mustafa1,Al Riyami Intisar Mohammed2,AalHamad Aya Hasan3,Al-Khabori Murtadha4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pharmacy Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care & Research Centre, Muscat, Oman;

2. Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmacy Department, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman;

3. Badr Alsama Hospitals and Clinics, Muscat, Oman; and

4. Department of Hematology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring for busulfan (Bu) is important to improve outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, standard therapeutic drug monitoring requires multiple samples and is inconvenient, labor-intensive, and costly. Accordingly, a limited sampling strategy (LSS) was evaluated, using 2-point sampling at end of infusion and at 6 hours, and the area-under-the-curve and Bu clearances (CLs) were compared with the results obtained from the standard sampling strategy (SSS) using 5–6 samples. Method: The analysis was based on retrospective clinical data from 202 patients receiving intravenous Bu before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for malignant or nonmalignant conditions. Bu plasma concentrations were measured via liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the PKCNA package in R program. Result: A total of 502 doses were analyzed by applying SSS and LSS. Using the modified Bland–Altman plot, the mean percentage difference in CL between the SSS and LSS estimates of Bu 6-hourly regimen was −41% (Limits: −53% and −30%). In the once daily regimen, the mean difference in CL between the 2 strategies on the modified Bland–Altman plot was −22% (Limits: −66% and +22%). Conclusions: The Bu CL values estimated based on the BU concentration at end of infusion and at 6 hours postinfusion were significantly higher than the values obtained via the SSS.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3