A Systematic Critical Review of Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Torasemide

Author:

Sherazi Abdul Wasay1,Zamir Ammara1,Rehman Anees ur1,Ashraf Waseem2,Imran Imran2,Saeed Hamid3,Majeed Abdul4,Saleem Zikria1,Aziz Majid,Alqahtani Faleh5,Rasool Muhammad Fawad1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan;

2. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan;

3. University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan;

4. Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan; and

5. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Purpose: Torasemide is a potassium-sparing loop diuretic used to treat fluid retention associated with congestive heart failure and kidney and hepatic diseases. This systematic review was conducted to combine all accessible data on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of torasemide in healthy and diseased populations, which may help clinicians avert adverse drug reactions and determine the correct dosage regimen. Methods: Four databases were systematically searched to screen for studies associated with the PK of torasemide, and 21 studies met the eligibility criteria. The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023390178). Results: A decrease in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was observed for torasemide after administration of the prolonged-release formulation in comparison to that after administration of the immediate-release formulation, that is, 1.12 ± 0.17 versus 1.6 ± 0.2 mcg/mL. After administering an oral dose of torasemide, a 2-fold increase in the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) was reported in patients with congestive heart failure compared with the healthy population. Moreover, the patients with renal failure (clearance < 30 mL/min) showed an increase in value of AUC0–∞ that is, 42.9 versus 8.091 mcg.h−1.mL−1 compared with healthy subjects. In addition, some studies have reported interactions with different drugs, in which irbesartan showed a slight increase in the AUC0–∞ of torasemide, whereas losartan and empagliflozin did not. Conclusions: The current review summarizes all available PK parameters of torasemide that may be beneficial for avoiding drug–drug interactions in subjects with renal and hepatic dysfunction and for predicting doses in patients with different diseases.

Funder

King Saud University

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3