Assessing Pharmacokinetic Correlates of Escitalopram-Related Adverse Drug Reactions

Author:

Kuzin Maxim12ORCID,Haen Ekkehard345,Kuzo Nazar6,Endres Katharina345,Hiemke Christoph78,Paulzen Michael91011,Schoretsanitis Georgios61213ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clienia Schloessli, Private Psychiatric Hospital and Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Zurich, Oetwil am See/Zurich, Switzerland;

2. Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences at the Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus;

3. Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany;

4. Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany;

5. Clinical Pharmacology, Institute AGATE gGmbH, Pentling, Germany;

6. Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;

7. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Mainz, Mainz, Germany;

8. Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center of Mainz, Mainz, Germany;

9. Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany;

10. JARA—Translational Brain Medicine, Jülich, Germany;

11. Alexianer Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany;

12. Department of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York; and

13. Department of Psychiatry, Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra, Hempstead, New York.

Abstract

Background: To assess the pharmacokinetic correlates of reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) under antidepressant treatment with escitalopram (ESC) using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database. Methods: A large naturalistic sample of inpatients and outpatients prescribed ESC was analyzed. ADRs were classified using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side effect rating scale. We compared ESC-treated patients with (n = 35) and without ADRs (n = 273) using ESC plasma concentrations as the primary outcome. We also compared ADR rates in the 2 groups based on 2 cut-off ESC levels reflecting the recommended upper thresholds of the therapeutic reference range of 80 ng/mL, suggested by the consensus therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines, and 40 ng/mL, based on recent meta-analysis data. The effects of age, sex, smoking, daily ESC dose, plasma concentrations, and concentrations corrected for daily dose were included in a binary logistic regression model to predict ADRs. Results: No differences in clinical, demographic, or pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between patients with and without ADRs (P > 0.05). Patients with ESC-related ADRs were more frequently diagnosed with psychotic disorders than those without (25% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.004). None of the variables was associated with ADR risk. Overall, ADR rates were not significantly different in patients above versus below thresholds of ESC concentrations (ESC concentrations >40 [n = 59] vs. ≤40 ng/mL [n = 249] and >80 [n = 8] vs. ≤80 ng/mL [n = 300]; P = 0.56 and P = 1.0, respectively). Conclusions: No distinct pharmacokinetic patterns underlying ESC-associated ADRs were observed. Further studies with more specific assessments of ADRs in larger cohorts are required to better identify potential underlying patterns.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3