What Are the Barriers and Facilitators for Critical Care Nurse Participation in a Patient Blood Management Program?

Author:

Wabeke Danita,Tolich Deborah

Abstract

BACKGROUND Patient blood management (PBM) programs strive to implement best practices, mitigating blood loss through procedures to decrease anemia and the need for transfusion. Critical care nurses may have the greatest impact on blood preservation and anemia prevention for the most critically ill patients. Nurse perceptions of barriers and facilitators in PBM are not fully understood. OBJECTIVES The primary aim was to determine critical care nurses' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to participation in PBM. The secondary aim was to understand ways in which they believe the barriers can be addressed. METHODS A qualitative descriptive method was used following Colaizzi's process. Critical care nurses (n = 110) were recruited from 10 critical care units in 1 quaternary care hospital to participate in focus groups. Data were analyzed using qualitative methodology and NVivo software. Communication interactions were categorized into codes and themes. RESULTS Study findings were gathered under 5 categories: assessing need for blood transfusions, laboratory challenges, availability and appropriateness of supplies, minimizing need for laboratory draws, and communication. Three prominent themes indicated that (a) critical care nurses have a limited awareness of PBM, (b) critical nurses must be empowered to engage in interprofessional collaboration, and (c) addressing barriers is not complex. CONCLUSION The data provide insight into the challenges of critical care nurse participation in PBM, driving next step efforts in building on the institution's strengths and improving engagement. It is imperative that the recommendations derived from critical care nurses' experiences be further developed.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care Nursing,Emergency Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3