Comparison of Ocular Wavefront Aberration Measurements Obtained Using Two Hartmann–Shack Wavefront Aberrometers

Author:

Koh ShizukaORCID,Inoue Ryota,Iwamoto Yuuri,Mihashi Toshifumi,Soma Takeshi,Maeda Naoyuki,Nishida Kohji

Abstract

Objectives: To assess agreement between measurements of ocular wavefront aberrations obtained using the Pentacam AXL Wave (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) (Aberrometer A) and KR-1W (Topcon Corp) (Aberrometer B), both of which are based on the Hartmann–Shack principle. Methods: In this prospective case–control study, ocular wavefront aberrations measurements were obtained using both aberrometers in patients with keratoconus (KC) and control participants. Ocular wavefront aberrations were measured through the natural pupil without dilation using both devices in a dark room. For both aberrometers, accommodation was inhibited by automatically adding fogging. The individual Zernike coefficients from the second to fourth order were compared between the two aberrometers for a 4-mm pupil diameter. Results: Twenty-six KC and 29 control eyes were assessed. Statistically significant correlations (P<0.05) were observed for all Zernike coefficients, except for Z4 −2 in the control group. Bland–Altman analysis indicated good agreement between aberrometers and no statistically significant differences in the control group. However, in the KC group, patterns of proportional error were observed in vertical coma Z3 −1 (r=0.338, P=0.008), trefoil Z4 −4 (r=0.701, P=0.003), secondary astigmatism Z4 −2 (r=0.348, P=0.025), and spherical aberrations Z4 0 (r=0.407, P=0.012). Conclusions: The Zernike coefficient values measured by the two aberrometers were well correlated in the control and KC groups. However, in eyes with KC, Aberrometer B tended to present greater values in several Zernike coefficients than Aberrometer A, suggesting that wavefront measurements obtained using the two aberrometers are not interchangeable in patients with KC.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Ophthalmology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3