Topical Anesthetics for Analgesia in Acute Corneal Abrasion: Eye Care Providers Survey

Abstract

Study Objectives: To evaluate the current attitudes of ophthalmologists and optometrists regarding topical anesthetic (TA) use in the emergency department (ED) for analgesia in corneal abrasions. Methods: A survey was distributed through email to ophthalmologists and optometrists, and their responses were deidentified. Three scenarios were presented involving the addition of tetracaine in addition to usual care in the setting of uncomplicated corneal abrasion. A 250-character space for comments and demographic questionnaire followed. A chi-square test, Fisher exact test, or sign test, at a significance level of 0.05, was used. Results: Of the 978 individuals surveyed, 486 responded (MD/DOs: 47.1% and ODs: 52.9%). Topical anesthetic favorability significantly decreased with shorter practice length when the patient was only examined by an ED provider. Topical anesthetic favorability was significantly impacted by respondents' degree type. When respondents were posed with using TAs if the respondents were the patient, the respondents were 22.6% more likely to use TA when compared with their answers in the scenario where the ED provider examined the patient and 20.0% more likely when compared with the scenario where a MD/OD examined the patient. Most did not support tetracaine use. Conclusions: Although treating pain is associated with improved quality of life, most respondents did not support TA use in the ED. Practice length and degree type significantly impacted responses. Respondents were more inclined to use TAs when the respondents were the patient. Results suggest that eye care providers need additional research data supporting safety before routine use in the ED, given the potential for adverse events with TAs.