Development and Evaluation of a Data-driven, Interactive Workshop to Facilitate Communication and Teamwork in Ambulatory Medical Oncology Settings

Author:

Blok Amanda C.12,Costa Deena Kelly3,Wright Nathan C.1,Manojlovich Milisa4,Friese Christopher R.15

Affiliation:

1. Author Affiliations: Center for Improving Patient and Population Health, Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, School of Nursing, University of Michigan (A. C. Blok, C. R. Friese, N. C. Wright)

2. Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System (A. C. Blok)

3. Yale School of Nursing and Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Yale School of Medicine (D. K. Costa)

4. Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, School of Nursing, University of Michigan (M. Manojlovich)

5. Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan (C. R. Friese).

Abstract

Background: While adverse events and toxicities related to cancer drug therapy in the ambulatory oncology setting are common and often rooted in communication challenges, few studies have examined the problems of communication or tested tools to improve communication in this unique, high-risk setting. Objective: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual interdisciplinary communication workshop designed to strengthen communication across ambulatory oncology team members. Methods: Surveys of patients and clinicians in 1 ambulatory oncology clinic were analyzed and informed the communication intervention: an interdisciplinary virtual workshop. Workshop evaluation included an implementation survey measure and a structured debrief with workshop attendees. Results: In total 87 patients and 56 clinicians participated in preworkshop surveys that revealed patient satisfaction with timely care and information, yet a range of rating communication experiences with the clinical team, and clinicians perceiving a high amount of organizational safety, yet rated discussion of alternatives to normal work processes low. Survey results guided reflection and discussion within the workshop. Six clinicians participated in the interactive workshop. Feasibility and acceptability of the virtual workshop were supported by formative and summative data, along with suggestions for improvement. Conclusions: The patient and clinician surveys coupled with an interactive virtual workshop were feasible and acceptable. Implications for Practice: The workshop identified opportunities for the individual- and system-level improvements in clinical team communication. This promising strategy requires replication in larger, diverse practice samples. Foundational: Clinicians accepted an interactive workshop that incorporated clinic-specific data and communication strategies. The program is feasible and acceptable in ambulatory oncology settings.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3