Association of Insurance Type With Inpatient Surgical 30-Day Readmissions, Emergency Department Visits/Observation Stays, and Costs

Abstract

Objective: To assess the association of Private, Medicare (MC), and Medicaid/Uninsured (MU) insurance type with 30-day emergency department visits/observation stays (EDOS), readmissions, and costs in a safety-net hospital (SNH) serving diverse socioeconomic status patients. Background: MC’s hospital readmission reduction program (HRRP) disproportionately penalizes SNHs. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used inpatient National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2013–2019) data merged with cost data. Frailty, expanded operative stress score, case status, and insurance type were used to predict odds of EDOS and readmissions, as well as index hospitalization costs. Results: The cohort had 1477 Private; 1164 MC; and 3488 MU cases with a patient mean age 52.1 years [SD = 14.7] and 46.8% of the cases were performed on male patients. MU [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.38–3.05, P < 0.001] and MC (aOR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.11–1.56, P = 0.001) had increased odds of urgent/emergent surgeries and complications versus Private patients. Despite having similar frailty distributions, MU compared to Private patients had higher odds of EDOS (aOR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.39–2.11, P < 0.001), and readmissions (aOR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.11–1.65, P = 0.004), after adjusting for frailty, OSS, and case status, whereas MC patients had similar odds of EDOS and readmissions versus Private. Hospitalization variable cost %change was increased for MC (12.5%) and MU (5.9%), but MU was similar to Private after adjusting for urgent/emergent cases. Conclusions: Increased rates and odds of urgent/emergent cases in MU patients drive increased odds of complications and index hospitalization costs versus Private. SNHs care for higher cost populations while receiving lower reimbursements and are further penalized by the unintended consequences of HRRP. Increasing access to care, especially for MU patients, could reduce urgent/emergent surgeries resulting in fewer complications, EDOS/readmissions, and costs.