Predictors and Significance of Readmission after Esophagogastric Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis

Author:

Evans Richard PT12,Kamarajah Sivesh K13,Evison Felicity4,Zou Xiaoxu4,Coupland Ben4,Griffiths Ewen A12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK

2. Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK

3. Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, UK

4. Health Data Science Team, Research and Development, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for readmission after elective esophagogastric cancer surgery and characterize the impact of readmission on long-term survival. The study will also identify whether the location of readmission to either the hospital that performed the primary surgery (index hospital) or another institution (nonindex hospital) has an impact on postoperative mortality. Background: Over the past decade, the center-volume relationship has driven the centralization of major cancer surgery, which has led to improvements in perioperative mortality. However, the impact of readmission, especially to nonindex centers, on long-term mortality remains unclear. Methods: This was a national population-based cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics of adult patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastrectomy in England between January 2008 and December 2019. Results: This study included 27,592 patients, of which overall readmission rates were 25.1% (index 15.3% and nonindex 9.8%). The primary cause of readmission to an index hospital was surgical in 45.2% and 23.7% in nonindex readmissions. Patients with no readmissions had significantly longer survival than those with readmissions (median: 4.5 vs 3.8 years; P < 0.001). Patients readmitted to their index hospital had significantly improved survival as compared to nonindex readmissions (median: 3.3 vs 4.7 years; P < 0.001). Minimally invasive surgery and surgery performed in high-volume centers had improved 90-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.75; P < 0.001; odds ratio, 0.60; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients requiring readmission to the hospital after surgery have an increased risk of mortality, which is worsened by readmission to a nonindex institution. Patients requiring readmission to the hospital should be assessed and admitted, if required, to their index institution.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference33 articles.

1. Rates of anastomotic complications and their management following esophagectomy: results of the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA).;Evans;Ann Surg,2021

2. Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries.;Knight;Lancet,2021

3. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.;Birkmeyer;N Engl J Med,2002

4. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.;Birkmeyer;N Engl J Med,2003

5. Is it time to centralize high-risk cancer care in the United States? comparison of outcomes of esophagectomy between England and the United States.;Munasinghe;Ann Surg,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3