Dispelling Dogma: American Association for Surgery of Trauma Prospective, Multicenter Trial of Index vs Delayed Fasciotomy after Extremity Trauma

Author:

Keating Jane J1,Klingensmith Nathan2,Moren Alexis M3,Skarupa David J4,Loria Anthony5,Maher Zoe6,Moore Sarah A7,Smith Michael C8,Seamon Mark J9,

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (Keating)

2. Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine-Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA (Klingensmith)

3. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University-Salem Health, Salem, OR (Moren)

4. Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL Skarupa)

5. Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY (Loria)

6. Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA (Maher)

7. Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM (Moore)

8. Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (Smith)

9. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA (Seamon).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical dogma states that “if you think about doing a fasciotomy, you do it,” yet the benefit of this approach remains unclear. We hypothesized that early fasciotomy during index operative procedures for extremity vascular trauma would be associated with improved patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, observational multicenter (17 level 1, 1 level 2) analysis included patients ≥15 years old with extremity vascular injury requiring operative management. Clinical variables were analyzed with respect to fasciotomy timing for correlation with outcomes, including muscle necrosis and limb amputation. Associated variables (p < 0.05) were input into multivariable logistic regression models evaluating these endpoints. RESULTS: Of 436 study patients, most were male (87%) with penetrating (57%), lower extremity (77%), arterial (73%), vein (40%), and bony (53%) injury with prolonged hospital length of stay (11 days). Patients who had index fasciotomy (66%) were compared with those who did not (34%), and no differences were appreciated with respect to age, initial systolic blood pressure, tourniquet time, “hard” signs of vascular injury, massive transfusion protocol activation, or Injury Severity Score (all p < 0.05). Of the 289 patients who underwent index fasciotomy, 49% had prophylactic fasciotomy, 11% developed muscle necrosis, 4% required an additional fasciotomy, and 8% required amputation, although only 28 of 147 (19%) required delayed fasciotomy in those without index fasciotomy. Importantly, forgoing index fasciotomy did not correlate (p > 0.05) with additional muscle necrosis or amputation risk in the delayed fasciotomy group. After controlling for confounders, index surgery fasciotomy was not associated with either muscle necrosis or limb salvage in multivariable models. CONCLUSIONS: Routine, index operation fasciotomy failed to demonstrate an outcome benefit in this prospective, multicenter analysis. Our data suggest that a careful observation and fasciotomy-when-needed approach may limit unnecessary surgery and its resulting morbidity in extremity vascular trauma patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

Reference18 articles.

1. Are certain fractures at increased risk for compartment syndrome after civilian ballistic injury?;Meskey;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2011

2. Penetrating vascular injury: diagnosis and management updates.;Slama;Emerg Med Clin North Am,2017

3. Incidence and predictors for the need for fasciotomy after extremity trauma: a 10-year review in a mature level I trauma centre.;Branco;Injury,2011

4. Fasciotomy for severe blunt and penetrating trauma to the extremity.;Vitale;Surg Gynecol Obstet,1998

5. The mangled extremity: compartment syndrome and amputations.;McGee;Emerg Clin North Am,1992

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3