Redefining Multimorbidity in Older Surgical Patients

Author:

Ramadan Omar I12,Rosenbaum Paul R23,Reiter Joseph G4,Jain Siddharth24,Hill Alexander S4,Hashemi Sean1,Kelz Rachel R12,Fleisher Lee A256,Silber Jeffrey H2478

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA (Ramadan, Kelz)

2. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Ramadan, Rosenbaum, Jain, Kelz, Fleisher, Silber)

3. Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Rosenbaum)

4. Center for Outcomes Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA (Reiter, Jain, Hill, Silber)

5. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA (Fleisher)

6. Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Fleisher)

7. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA (Silber)

8. Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Silber).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity in surgery is common and associated with worse postoperative outcomes. However, conventional multimorbidity definitions (≥2 comorbidities) label the vast majority of older patients as multimorbid, limiting clinical usefulness. We sought to develop and validate better surgical specialty-specific multimorbidity definitions based on distinct comorbidity combinations. STUDY DESIGN: We used Medicare claims for patients aged 66 to 90 years undergoing inpatient general, orthopaedic, or vascular surgery. Using 2016 to 2017 data, we identified all comorbidity combinations associated with at least 2-fold (general/orthopaedic) or 1.5-fold (vascular) greater risk of 30-day mortality compared with the overall population undergoing the same procedure; we called these combinations qualifying comorbidity sets. We applied them to 2018 to 2019 data (general = 230,410 patients, orthopaedic = 778,131 patients, vascular = 146,570 patients) to obtain 30-day mortality estimates. For further validation, we tested whether multimorbidity status was associated with differential outcomes for patients at better-resourced (based on nursing skill-mix, surgical volume, teaching status) hospitals vs all other hospitals using multivariate matching. RESULTS: Compared with conventional multimorbidity definitions, the new definitions labeled far fewer patients as multimorbid: general = 85.0% (conventional) vs 55.9% (new) (p < 0.0001); orthopaedic = 66.6% vs 40.2% (p < 0.0001); and vascular = 96.2% vs 52.7% (p < 0.0001). Thirty-day mortality was higher by the new definitions: general = 3.96% (conventional) vs 5.64% (new) (p < 0.0001); orthopaedic = 0.13% vs 1.68% (p < 0.0001); and vascular = 4.43% vs 7.00% (p < 0.0001). Better-resourced hospitals offered significantly larger mortality benefits than all other hospitals for multimorbid vs nonmultimorbid general and orthopaedic, but not vascular, patients (general surgery difference-in-difference = ˗0.94% [˗1.36%, ˗0.52%], p < 0.0001; orthopaedic = ˗0.20% [˗0.34%, ˗0.05%], p = 0.0087; and vascular = ˗0.12% [˗0.69%, 0.45%], p = 0.6795). CONCLUSIONS: Our new multimorbidity definitions identified far more specific, higher-risk pools of patients than conventional definitions, potentially aiding clinical decision-making.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3