Identifying Population-Level and Within-Hospital Disparities in Surgical Care

Author:

de Jager Elzerie123,Osman Samia Y24,Sheu Christina2,Moberg Esther2,Ye Jamie2,Liu Yaoming5,Cohen Mark E5,Burstin Helen R6,Hoyt David B7,Schoenfeld Andrew J28,Haider Adil H29,Ko Clifford Y510,Maggard-Gibbons Melinda A10,Weissman Joel S2,Britt LD11

Affiliation:

1. From the Division of Public Health, Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT (de Jager)

2. Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Osman, Sheu, Moberg, Ye, Schoenfeld, Haider, Weissman)

3. College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia (de Jager)

4. Johns Hopkins Hospital and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Osman)

5. Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL (Liu, Cohen, Ko)

6. Council of Medical Specialty Societies, Washington, DC (Burstin)

7. American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL (Hoyt)

8. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Schoenfeld)

9. Office of the Dean, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan (Haider)

10. Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA (Ko, Maggard-Gibbons)

11. Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA (Britt).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lack of consensus on equity measurement and its incorporation into quality-assessment programs at the hospital and system levels may be a barrier to addressing disparities in surgical care. This study aimed to identify population-level and within-hospital differences in the quality of surgical care provision. STUDY DESIGN: The analysis included 657 NSQIP participating hospitals with more than 4 million patients (2014 to 2018). Multilevel random slope, random intercept modeling was used to examine for population-level and in-hospital disparities. Disparities in surgical care by Area Deprivation Index (ADI), race, and ethnicity were analyzed for 5 measures: all-case inpatient mortality, all-case urgent readmission, all-case postoperative surgical site infection, colectomy mortality, and spine surgery complications. RESULTS: Population-level disparities were identified across all measures by ADI, 2 measures for Black race (all-case readmissions and spine surgery complications), and none for Hispanic ethnicity. Disparities remained significant in the adjusted models. Before risk adjustment, in all measures examined, within-hospital disparities were detected in: 25.8% to 99.8% of hospitals for ADI, 0% to 6.1% of hospitals for Black race, and 0% to 0.8% of hospitals for Hispanic ethnicity. After risk adjustment, in all measures examined, less than 1.1% of hospitals demonstrated disparities by ADI, race, or ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: After risk adjustment, very few hospitals demonstrated significant disparities in care. Disparities were more frequently detected by ADI than by race and ethnicity. The lack of substantial in-hospital disparities may be due to the use of postoperative metrics, small sample sizes, the risk adjustment methodology, and healthcare segregation. Further work should examine surgical access and healthcare segregation.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3