Multisite Implementation of an American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative

Author:

Ma Meixi12,Peters Xane D13,Zhang Lindsey M14,Hornor Melissa3,Christensen Kataryna1,Coleman JoAnn5,Finlayson Emily6,Flood Kellie L7,Katlic Mark5,Lagoo-Deenadayalan Sandhya8,Robinson Thomas N9,Rosenthal Ronnie A10,Tang Victoria L11,Ko Clifford Y112,Russell Marcia M12

Affiliation:

1. From the Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL (Ma, Peters, Zhang, Christensen, Ko)

2. Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL (Ma)

3. Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL (Peters, Hornor)

4. Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL (Zhang)

5. Sinai Center for Geriatric Surgery, Sinai Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Coleman, Katlic)

6. Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Finlayson)

7. Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Hospice, and Palliative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL (Flood)

8. Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC (Lagoo-Deenadayalan)

9. Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO (Robinson)

10. Department of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT (Rosenthal)

11. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Tang)

12. Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (Ko, Russell).

Abstract

BACKGROUND:The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Coalition for Quality in Geriatric Surgery (CQGS) identified standards of surgical care for the growing, vulnerable population of aging adults in the US. The aims of this study were to determine implementation feasibility for 30 selected standards, identify barriers and best practices in their implementation, and further refine these geriatric standards and verification process.STUDY DESIGN:The CQGS requested participation from hospitals involved in the ACS NSQIP Geriatric Surgery Pilot Project, previous CQGS feasibility analyses, and hospitals affiliated with a core development team member. Thirty standards were selected for implementation. After implementation, site visits were conducted, and postvisit surveys were distributed.RESULTS:Eight hospitals were chosen to participate. Program management (55%), immediate preoperative and intraoperative clinical care (62.5%), and postoperative clinical care (58%) had the highest mean percentage of “fully compliant” standards. Goals and decision-making (30%), preoperative optimization (28%), and transitions of care (12.5%) had the lowest mean percentage of fully compliant standards. Best practices and barriers to implementation were identified across 13 of the 30 standards. More than 80% of the institutions reported that participation changed the surgical care provided for older adults.CONCLUSIONS:This study represents the first national implementation assessment undertaken by the ACS for one of its quality programs. The CQGS pilot testing was able to demonstrate implementation feasibility for 30 standards, identify challenges and best practices, and further inform dissemination of the ACS Geriatric Surgery Verification Program.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

Reference19 articles.

1. Ambulatory surgery data from hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers: United States, 2010.;Hall;Natl Health Stat Report,2017

2. Impact of advancing age on abdominal surgical outcomes.;Massarweh;Arch Surg,2009

3. Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.;Bentrem;Arch Surg,2009

4. Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study.;Finlayson;J Am Coll Surg,2007

5. Advancing age and 30-day adverse outcomes after nonemergent general surgeries.;Gajdos;J Am Geriatr Soc,2013

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3