Increased Time Interval of Postoperative Flap Monitoring After Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Author:

Schwartzberg Harel G.1,Doran Hannah E.2,Bartow Matthew J.1,Patterson Charles3,Stalder Mark W.,Allen Robert J.1,St. Hilaire Hugo1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA

2. LSUHSC School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA

3. University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT.

Abstract

Background Hourly flap checks are the most common means of flap monitoring during the first 24 hours following autologous breast reconstruction (ABR). This practice often requires intensive care unit (ICU) admission, which is a key driver of health care costs and decreased patient satisfaction. This study addresses these issues by demonstrating decreased cost and length of admission associated with a 4-hour interval between flap checks during the first 24 hours following ABR. Methods This is a retrospective review of ABR surgeries performed by multiple surgeons from 2017 to 2020. Two cohorts were identified, one that underwent flap checks every hour in the ICU (Q1 cohort) and the other that underwent flap checks every 4 hours on the hospital floor (Q4 cohort). Our primary outcome measures were length of stay (LOS), flap takebacks, flap loss, and encounter cost. Results Rates of flap takeback and loss did not differ between cohorts (P = 0.18, P = 0.21). The Q4 cohort's average LOS was shorter than the Q1 cohort (P = 0.002). The Q4 cohort's average cost was also $25,554.80 less than the Q1 cohort (P < 0.001). This association persisted after controlling for LOS, operating room takeback, timing and laterality of reconstruction, and flap configuration (hazard ratio = 0.65, P = 0.0007). Conclusion This study demonstrates the benefits of lengthened flap check intervals during the first 24 hours following ABR. These intervals decrease the cost of ABR while also maintaining safety, making ABR a more accessible option for breast reconstruction patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference23 articles.

1. Technology in microvascular surgery;Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am,2010

2. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction;Ann Plast Surg,1994

3. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap;J Reconstr Microsurg,2014

4. Rise in microsurgical free-flap breast reconstruction in academic medical practices;Ann Plast Surg,2015

5. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: a comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps;J Surg Oncol,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3