Author:
Kondra Katelyn,Roohani Idean,Carey Joseph N.
Abstract
Background
Reconstruction of the proximal one-third of the leg often requires soft tissue transfer to facilitate limb salvage. Tissue transfers are usually local or free flaps depending on wound dimensions, location, and surgeon preference. Historically, the proximal third of the leg was covered with pedicle flaps, but recently, we have used more free flaps in this position. Using data from a level 1 trauma center, we sought to evaluate outcomes of surgical management of proximal-third leg reconstruction across local and free flaps.
Methods
This is an institutional review board–approved, retrospective chart review undertaken at LAC + USC Medical Center from 2007 to 2021. Patient history, demographics, flap characteristics, Gustilo-Anderson fracture classification, and outcomes were collected and analyzed in an internal database. Outcomes of interest included flap failure rates, postoperative complications, and long-term ambulatory status.
Results
Among 394 lower extremity flaps placed, 122 flaps involved the proximal-third leg across 102 patients. Average age of patients was 42.8 ± 15.2 years; of note, the free flap cohort was significantly younger than the local flap cohort (P = 0.019). Ten local flaps suffered from infectious complications: osteomyelitis (n = 6) and hardware infection (n = 4), versus only 1 free flap that suffered from hardware infection; notably, these differences were not significant across cohorts. Free flaps had significantly more flap revisions (13.3%; P = 0.039) and overall flap complications (20.0%; P = 0.031) compared with local flaps; however, partial flap necrosis (4.9%) and flap loss (3.3%) were not significantly different across cohorts. Overall flap survival was 96.7%, and full ambulation was achieved in 42.2% of patients without significant differences across cohorts.
Conclusions
Our evaluation of proximal-third leg wounds demonstrates fewer infectious outcomes with free flaps compared with local flaps. There are multiple confounding variables; however, this finding may speak to the reliability of a robust free flap. Overall, there was no significant difference in patient comorbidities across flap cohorts with great overall flap survival. Ultimately, flap selection did not affect rates of flap necrosis, flap loss, or final ambulatory status.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)