Phacoemulsification using an Active Fluidics System at Physiologic versus High IOP: Impact on Anterior and Posterior Segment Physiology

Author:

Rauen Matthew P.1ORCID,Joiner Hillery1,Kohler Robyn A.1,O’Connor Sara2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. . Wolfe Eye Clinic. West Des Moines, Iowa, USA.

2. . O’Connor Consulting Services, Charleston, West Virginia, USA.

Abstract

Purpose Evaluate the impact of high vs low intraoperative IOP during phacoemulsification on anterior and posterior physiology Setting Private practice in Des Moines, Iowa. Design Prospective, randomized, paired-eye clinical trial of patients anticipating bilateral cataract surgery. Methods Twenty-seven subjects randomized at the time of their first cataract surgery to either low intraocular pressure (IOP) or high IOP group. The subsequent cataract surgery was done under the alternate condition. During phacoemulsification and cortex removal, IOP was maintained either at low (≤28 mmHg) or at high (≥55-60 mmHg) levels. The primary outcome was fluid usage, with secondary outcomes of central corneal thickness, FAZ (foveal avascular zone) area, foveal and macular thickness, endothelial cell density and post-operative inflammation. Results Surgery with low IOP settings used less fluid (40.0cc v 55.6 cc, p<0.0001). Corneal thickness changes were smaller in low IOP eyes at 1 day and 1 week (3.0% v 8.1%, p=0.01; 3.1% v 4.4%, p=0.01) but were similar by 1 and 3 months. Endothelial cell density (ECD) dropped less in low IOP eyes at 1 and 3 months (-1.7%v-12.3%, p=0.001, 2.1% vs -8.9%, p=0.0003.) IOP remained a significant predictor of ECD change when relationship was controlled for fluid use and phaco energy. Retinal parameters did not vary among all eyes or when compared by IOP setting. Visual acuity was similar at all time points. Conclusions Low IOP settings resulted in less inflammation and less corneal trauma, as evidenced by a smaller drop in endothelial cell density and less postop corneal edema, when compared to high IOP settings. Retinal parameters did not change significantly. The different outcomes did not result in a difference in visual acuity.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3