Changes in endothelial cell density following conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in eyes with dense cataracts

Author:

Ganesh Sri1ORCID,Brar Sheetal1ORCID,Wadhokar Sanjali1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Phaco and refractive services, Nethradhama Super Speciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the safety, effectiveness and changes in endothelial cell density following standard phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in dense cataracts (LOCS III grade 3.0 NO and above). Setting: Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India Design: Prospective, randomized, comparative study Method: 100 eyes of 100 patients were randomly assigned to either conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) or FLACS (LENSAR Laser System) using pre-defined patterns of nuclear fragmentations. Measured outcomes included intra-operative phaco time, irrigation fluid volume, surgical time and complication rates. Endothelial cell density was evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks and 6 months post-operatively. Results: The CPS group had significantly higher mean total phaco time (TPT, 11.17 ± 6.5 sec vs 8.03 ± 3.77 sec), effective phaco time (EPT, 6.14 ± 3.62 sec vs 4.42 ± 2.07 sec) and total surgical time (8.18 ± 2.36 min vs 7.11 ± 1.55 min) than the FLACS group (p<0.001). Volume of irrigation fluid was comparable between the two groups (CPS, 36.7 ± 12.18 ml, FLACS, 38.64 ± 13.73 ml, (p =0. 45). Mean corneal oedema score and CCT values on POD-1 were significantly higher for the CPS group. At 6 months, % endothelial cell density (ECD) loss was significantly higher in the CPS group (16.08%) versus the FLACS group (12.8%), p <0.001. Three eyes in the CPS group had wound burns of varying severity. Conclusion: FLACS with customized nuclear fragmentation patterns resulted in significantly less intra-operative phaco time, surgical time and endothelial cell loss compared to conventional phacoemulsification when treating dense cataracts.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3