In Vitro Analysis of Clinically Relevant Aspects of a Polymer-Coated Phacoemulsification Tip Versus a Traditional Tip

Author:

Zacharias Jaime1

Affiliation:

1. Pasteur Ophthalmology Clinic, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To compare the in vitro incisional temperature, acoustic energy, transient cavitation, and turbulence of the polymer-coated hybrid phacoemulsification tip with the balanced tip. Setting: Pasteur Ophthalmology Clinic, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile. Design: Laboratory study Methods: The Centurion Vision System with Active Sentry handpiece was used with tips operated in torsional mode, and stroke was normalized. For thermal measurements, controlled loads were applied over the tip sleeve simulating the pressure applied at the expected level of the corneal incision. Heat generated was recorded on a blackbody filmstrip using infrared imaging. A directional hydrophone provided 360° mapping of acoustic pressure. Cavitation patterns with increasing ultrasound power were imaged with high-speed video recording. Particle image velocimetry was used to evaluate turbulence, streaming, and bubble formation. Results: The temperature rise for the hybrid and balanced tips was lower than with the control mini-flared Kelman tip (P≤0.0001). The hybrid tip generated reduced acoustic output compared with the balanced tip. Ultrasound threshold for cavitation was higher for the hybrid versus balanced tip (55% vs 25%). Fluid turbulence was more evident with the balanced tip compared with the hybrid tip at all flow conditions when normalized for stroke at 60% and 80% power for balanced and hybrid tip, respectively. Conclusion: The polymer-coated hybrid tip showed reduced heat generation compared with the control mini-flared Kelman tip and had lower acoustic output, lower cavitation, and lower turbulence compared with the balanced tip, suggesting potential for improved clinical safety.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Sensory Systems,Ophthalmology,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3