Investigating the topographic effect of epithelium in myopic eyes with subtle topographic preoperative abnormalities

Author:

Salah-Mabed Imene12,Saad Alain12,Gatinel Damien12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anterior Segment and Refractive Surgery, Fondation Rothschild, Paris France

2. CEROC: Center of Expertise and Research in Optics for Clinicians.

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the topographic impact of the epithelium in Keratoconus Suspected (KCS) and in “Normal” Placido classified corneas. Setting: Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. Design: Prospective interventional case series. Methods: Anterior corneal specular Placido topography using OPD-Scan® II (NIDEK, Gammagori, Japan) was performed in 97 eyes of 67 patients undergoing PRK for myopia, before and after epithelium removal. The differences in axial keratometry, asphericity and astigmatism were computed. Results: After epithelial peeling, some Placido-normal classified corneas became KCS. Therefore, we have subdivided this group into two groups: one of normal classified corneas which stayed normal after epithelium removal (Group NN), and one of corneas that became KCS classified (Group NK).The mean difference in axial mean keratometry in the third central millimeter rings was +0.50 ± 0.24 D, 0.69 ± 0.31 D and 0.49 ± 0.35 D and the mean difference in the magnitude of epithelial induced astigmatism in the first central millimetre ring was 0.37 D x 89° (positive cylinder), 0.54 D 86° and 0.52 D 86° respectively in Group NN, NK and KK (KCS corneas that stayed KCS). These differences were significant (p< 0.0001). Preoperative keratometry was the only predictive factor differentiating Group NN from NK (p<0.001). Conclusions: The epithelial layer tended to reduce the magnitude of the Bowman layer’s astigmatism, prolateness and keratometry, more importantly in Group NK. In KK group we found a similar trend as in normal eyes (Group NN). The epithelium would be able to mask Bowman layer’s irregularities until a certain degree of severity.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3