Affiliation:
1. Gemini Eye Clinic, Zlin, Czech Republic
2. Prince Charles Eye Unit King Edward VII Hospital Windsor UK
3. Department of Engineering Zurich University of Applied Science Zurich Switzerland
Abstract
Purpose:
Comparing 3 capsulotomy centration methods.
Setting:
Private clinic, Zlin, Czech Republic
Design:
Prospective, consecutive case series
Method:
180 eyes undergoing cataract surgery had anterior capsule staining with microfiltered 0.4% trypan blue solution before selective laser capsulotomy (SLC). The first 60 eyes (Group 1) had mydriatic dilated pupil centred capsulotomies. The next 60 eyes (Group 2) were centred on the trypan blue central landmark (TCL). The final 60 capsulotomies (Group 3) were centred on the patient fixated coaxial Purkinje reflex (CPR). Measurements between key anatomical landmarks and the TCL, CPR capsulotomies and implanted IOL centre were made.
Results:
The TCL, observed in >94% of eyes in the study, coincided with the CPR with a displacement < 0.1 +/- 0.1 mm. Group 1 capsulotomies were noticeably decentred on the IOLs by 0.3 +/- 0.2 mm. The Group 2 symmetrical IOL relationship was maintained with a decentration of 0.15 +/- 0.1 mm. Group 3 had a similar decentration with the IOLs with 0.15 +/- 0.1 mm. Verification with IOLMaster 700 data and Callisto Eye System (both Carl Zeiss AG) showed that the CPR and the TCL were coincident with the measured visual axis.
Conclusions:
The clearly visible TCL served as an alternate landmark to the patient fixated CPR and being on the anterior capsule was not sensitive to tilt. Further patient compliance was not required. Both were superior to dilated pupil centration, to achieve symmetric IOL coverage. This has application for both capsulotomies and capsulorhexes.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)