Gender perspective in psoriasis: a scoping review and proposal of strategies for improved clinical practice by European dermatologists

Author:

Gonzalez-Cantero Alvaro12,Constantin María Magdalena34,Dattola Annunziata5,Hillary Tom6,Kleyn Elise7,Magnolo Nina8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

2. School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain

3. Departments of Dermatologists, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

4. 2nd Department of Dermatology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

5. Department of Dermatology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Rome, Italy

6. Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

7. Brain-Skin Unit, The Dermatology Centre, Departments of Dermatologists, University of Manchester and Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK

8. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of psoriasis is similar between men and women; however, evidence exists of sex- and gender-related differences in disease expression, impact, coping, and needs of patients with psoriasis. These differences are essential and should be considered in clinical practice and research. Objective: To compile available evidence on sex- and gender-related differences in psoriasis, identify the most critical gaps in clinical practice and research, and use it to propose strategies for improved clinical practice. Methods: Six European dermatologists selected the topics to consider according to their relevance in the dermatology setting with the support of methodologists. Evidence on sex- and gender-related differences was obtained by a scoping review based on search strategies in Medline and Cochrane Library from inception to October 2021 using the following terms: arthritis, psoriatic, psoriasis, gender, and sex. The panel discussed the results and proposed strategies by consensus. Results: The scoping review identified broad themes: (1) clinical expression, (2) severity and patient-reported outcomes, (3) psychosocial impact, (4) access to treatments and propensity to treat, (5) comorbidities, and (6) treatment effect. The strategies are based on these broad themes. Limitations: No risk of bias assessment was done due to the scoping nature of the review. Conclusion: This review offers insights into gender differences in psoriasis, providing a foundation for improving clinical practice and patient outcomes.

Funder

UCB Biopharma SRL

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Dermatology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3