Promises and pitfalls of imaging-based biomarkers in motor neuron diseases

Author:

Tan Ee Ling1,Bede Peter12,Pradat Pierre-Francois34

Affiliation:

1. Computational Neuroimaging Group, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin

2. Department of Neurology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

3. Department of Neurology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital

4. Laboratoire d’Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne University, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France

Abstract

Purpose of review Although neuroimaging in motor neuron diseases (MNDs) continues to generate important novel academic insights, the translation of novel radiological protocols into viable biomarkers remains challenging. Recent findings A multitude of technological advances contribute to the success of academic imaging in MND such as the availability of high-field MRI platforms, novel imaging techniques, quantitative spinal cord protocols to whole-brain spectroscopy. International collaborations, protocol harmonization efforts, open-source image analysis suites also fuel developments in the field. Despite the success of academic neuroimaging in MND, the meaningful interpretation of radiological data from single patients and accurate classification into relevant diagnostic, phenotypic and prognostic categories remain challenging. Appraising accruing disease burden over the short follow-up intervals typically used in pharmacological trials is also notoriously difficult. Summary Although we acknowledge the academic achievements of large descriptive studies, an unmet priority of neuroimaging in MND is the development of robust diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring applications to meet the practical demands of clinical decision-making and pharmacological trials. A paradigm shift from group-level analyses to individual-level data interpretation, accurate single-subject classification and disease-burden tracking is therefore urgently needed to distil raw spatially coded imaging data into practical biomarkers.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3