Care interruptions and mortality among adults in Europe and North America

Author:

Trickey Adam1,Zhang Lei2,Rentsch Christopher T.3,Pantazis Nikos4,Izquierdo Rebeca5,Antinori Andrea6,Leierer Gisela7,Burkholder Greer8,Cavassini Matthias9,Palacio-Vieira Jorge10,Gill M. John11,Teira Ramon12,Stephan Christoph13,Obel Niels14,Vehreschild Jorg-Janne15,Sterling Timothy R.16,Van Der Valk Marc17,Bonnet Fabrice18,Crane Heidi M.19,Silverberg Michael J.20,Ingle Suzanne M.1,Sterne Jonathan A.C.1,

Affiliation:

1. Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK

2. School of Public Finance and Management, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, China

3. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

4. Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

5. National Center for Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Centre of Biomedical Research for Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain

6. National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy

7. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

8. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

9. Infectious Diseases Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

10. Centre for Epidemiological Studies on HIV/AIDS and STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT)

11. Dept of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada

12. Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario de Sierrallana, Torrelavega, Cantabria, Spain

13. Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

14. Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

15. Department I for Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

16. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA

17. Stichting HIV Monitoring, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Dept of Infectious diseases, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

18. Université de Bordeaux, INSERM U1219, Bordeaux Population Health and CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France

19. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

20. Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.

Abstract

Objective: Interruptions in care of people with HIV (PWH) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are associated with adverse outcomes, but most studies have relied on composite outcomes. We investigated whether mortality risk following care interruptions differed from mortality risk after first starting ART. Design: Collaboration of 18 European and North American HIV observational cohort studies of adults with HIV starting ART between 2004 and 2019. Methods: Care interruptions were defined as gaps in contact of ≥365 days, with a subsequent return to care (distinct from loss to follow-up), or ≥270 days and ≥545 days in sensitivity analyses. Follow-up time was allocated to no/preinterruption or postinterruption follow-up groups. We used Cox regression to compare hazards of mortality between care interruption groups, adjusting for time-updated demographic and clinical characteristics and biomarkers upon ART initiation or re-initiation of care. Results: Of 89 197 PWH, 83.4% were male and median age at ART start was 39 years [interquartile range (IQR): 31–48)]. 8654 PWH (9.7%) had ≥1 care interruption; 10 913 episodes of follow-up following a care interruption were included. There were 6104 deaths in 536 334 person-years, a crude mortality rate of 11.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.1–11.7] per 1000 person-years. The adjusted mortality hazard ratio (HR) for the postinterruption group was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.57–1.88) compared with the no/preinterruption group. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses assuming ≥270-day (HR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.40–1.60) and ≥545-day (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.48–1.88) interruptions. Conclusions: Mortality was higher among PWH reinitiating care following an interruption, compared with when PWH initially start ART, indicating the importance of uninterrupted care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3