Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose

Author:

Wijbenga Nynke12ORCID,de Jong Nadine L.A.123ORCID,Hoek Rogier A.S.12ORCID,Mathot Bas J.12ORCID,Seghers Leonard12ORCID,Aerts Joachim G.J.V.1ORCID,Bos Daniel45ORCID,Manintveld Olivier C.26ORCID,Hellemons Merel E.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

2. Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

3. Educational Program Technical Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Delft University of Technology and Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

4. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

5. Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

6. Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Abstract

Background. Bacterial colonization (BC) of the lower airways is common in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) and increases the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Diagnosis often requires bronchoscopy. Exhaled breath analysis using electronic nose (eNose) technology may noninvasively detect BC in LTRs. Therefore, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of an eNose to detect BC in LTRs. Methods. We performed a cross-sectional analysis within a prospective, single-center cohort study assessing the diagnostic accuracy of detecting BC using eNose technology in LTRs. In the outpatient clinic, consecutive LTR eNose measurements were collected. We assessed and classified the eNose measurements for the presence of BC. Using supervised machine learning, the diagnostic accuracy of eNose for BC was assessed in a random training and validation set. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results. In total, 161 LTRs were included with 80 exclusions because of various reasons. Of the remaining 81 patients, 16 (20%) were classified as BC and 65 (80%) as non-BC. eNose-based classification of patients with and without BC provided an area under the curve of 0.82 in the training set and 0.97 in the validation set. Conclusions. Exhaled breath analysis using eNose technology has the potential to noninvasively detect BC.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Transplantation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3