Affiliation:
1. Maternal Fetal Medicine Fellow
2. Professor Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Importance
The induction rate continues to increase in the United States placing pressure on the health care system with increasing cost and time spent on labor and delivery. Most labor induction regimens have evaluated uncomplicated singleton-term gestations. Unfortunately, the optimal labor regimens of medically complicated pregnancies have not been well described.
Objective
The aim of this study was to review the current available evidence regarding the various labor induction regimens and understand the evidence that exists for induction regimens in complicated pregnancies.
Evidence Acquisition
Data were acquired by a literature search on PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Review database, the most recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin on labor induction, and a review of the most recent edition on widely used obstetric texts for key words related to labor induction.
Results
Many heterogeneous clinical trials exist examining various labor induction regimens such as prostaglandin only, oxytocin only, or a combination of mechanical dilation with prostaglandins or oxytocin. Several Cochrane systematic reviews have been performed, which suggest a combination of prostaglandins and mechanical dilation results in an improved time to delivery when compared with single-use methods. Evaluating pregnancies complicated by maternal or fetal conditions, there exist retrospective cohorts describing significantly different labor outcomes. Although a few of these populations have planned or active clinical trials, most do not have an optimal labor induction regimen described.
Conclusions and Relevance
Most induction trials are significantly heterogeneous and limited to uncomplicated pregnancies. A combination of prostaglandins and mechanical dilation may result in improved outcomes. Complicated pregnancies have significantly different labor outcomes; however, almost none have well-described labor induction regimens.
Target Audience
Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians
Learning Objectives
After completing this activity, the learner should be better able to describe the various inpatient cervical ripening regimens available in the United States; discuss the evidence on the current inpatient cervical ripening regimens available for several maternal medical conditions (obesity, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, advanced maternal age, and others); and explain current inpatient cervical ripening regimens available for several fetal medical conditions (preterm gestations, fetal growth restriction, and others).
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献