Comparing State-Level and Facility-Based Review to Assess Quality of Severe Maternal Morbidity Reviews

Abstract

Objective: To compare results from facility-level and state-level severe maternal morbidity (SMM) reviews in Illinois. Design: We report descriptive characteristics about SMM cases and compare the results of both review processes, including the primary cause, assessment of preventability, and factors that contributed to the severity of the SMM cases. Setting: All birthing hospitals in Illinois. Participants: A total of 81 SMM cases were reviewed by a facility-level committee and the state-level review committee. SMM was defined as any intensive care or critical care unit admission and/or transfusion of 4 or more units of packed red blood cells from conception to 42 days postpartum. Results: Among the cases reviewed by both committees, hemorrhage was the primary cause of morbidity, with 26 (32.1%) and 38 (46.9%) hemorrhage cases identified by the facility-level and state-level committees, respectively. Both committees identified infection/sepsis (n = 12) and preeclampsia/eclampsia (n = 12) as the next most common causes of SMM. State-level review found more cases potentially preventable (n = 29, 35.8% vs n = 18, 22.2%) and more cases not preventable but improvement in care needed (n = 31, 38.3% vs n = 27, 33.3%). State-level review found more provider and system opportunities to alter the SMM outcome and fewer patient opportunities than facility-level review. Conclusion: State-level review found more SMM cases potentially preventable and identified more opportunities to improve care than facility-level review. State-level review has the potential to strengthen facility-level reviews by identifying opportunities to improve the review process and develop recommendations and tools to aid facility-level reviews.