Comparative Analysis of Predetermined Axillary Crutch Length Settings to Individualized Fittings

Author:

Taweel Nicholas,Langman Charles,Sullivan Paul,Schick Faith,Karanjia Homyar,Gulick Dawn T.ORCID

Abstract

Axillary crutches are the most common assistive devices given to individuals with musculoskeletal injuries in an acute care setting. Nurses are frequently the care provider fitting injured individuals with crutches. This study compared the crutch length determined by the crutch manufacturer's height setting with the crutch length attained after applying a standard clinical protocol for crutch fitting. A total of 116 adults with lower extremity injuries were enrolled. Self-reported height was documented as well as initial crutch length as indicated by the numbers on the push-button feature of the crutches. Subject height with and without shoes was measured. Proper crutch length was then determined using the method described by Bauer et al. (1991). No change between the initial and adjusted crutch settings was made in 43% of the subjects. Change was made in 57% of the subjects: lengthening in 40% and shortening in 17% of subjects. This study revealed the predetermined crutch settings are unreliable and should simply be used as a starting point during a personalized fitting.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference6 articles.

1. A comparative analysis of several crutch-length-estimation techniques;Bauer;Physical Therapy,1991

2. Analysis of methods of teaching axillary crutch measurements;Beckwith;Physical Therapy,1965

3. Experimental characterization of axillary/underarm interface pressure in swing-through crutch walking;Borrelli;Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development,2013

4. Crutch-induced bilateral brachial artery aneurysms;Konishi;Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery,2009

5. Crutch walker's shoulder;Pringle;Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3