Perioperative platform for muscle-invasive bladder cancer trials: designs and endpoints

Author:

Laukhtina Ekaterina1,Moschini Marco2,Teoh Jeremy Yuen-Chun3,Shariat Shahrokh F.14567

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

2. Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy

3. S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

4. Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria

5. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York

6. Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA

7. Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Abstract

Purpose of review This review explores the design and endpoints of perioperative platforms in clinical trials for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Recent findings The choice of clinical trial design in perioperative platforms for MIBC must align with specific research objectives to ensure robust and meaningful outcomes. Novel designs in perioperative platforms for MIBC integrate bladder-sparing approaches. Primary endpoints such as pathological complete response and disease-free survival are highlighted for their role in expediting trial results in perioperative setting. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes is important to inform healthcare decision makers about the outcomes most meaningful to patients. Given the growing body of evidence, potential biomarkers, predictive and prognostic tools should be considered and implemented when designing trials in perioperative platforms for MIBC. Summary Effective perioperative platforms for MIBC trials are critical in enhancing patient outcomes. The careful selection and standardization of study designs and endpoints in the perioperative platform are essential for the successful implementation of new therapies and the advancement of personalized treatment approaches in MIBC.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3