Diagnostic performance of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions ≤10 mm

Author:

Kawasaki Yuki,Hijioka Susumu1,Nagashio Yoshikuni1,Ohba Akihiro1,Maruki Yuta1,Takeshita Kotaro1,Takasaki Tetsuro1,Agarie Daiki1,Hagiwara Yuya1,Hara Hidenobu1,Okamoto Kohei1,Yamashige Daiki1,Kondo Shunsuke1,Morizane Chigusa1,Ueno Hideki1,Mizui Takahiro2,Takamoto Takeshi2,Nara Satoshi2,Ban Daisuke2,Esaki Minoru2,Saito Yutaka3,Hiraoka Nobuyoshi4,Okusaka Takuji1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

2. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

3. Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

4. Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives EUS tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is the standard diagnostic method for solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs); however, there are few reports on EUS-TA results for SPLs ≤10 mm. Furthermore, given the recent advent of fine-needle biopsy, the current diagnostic accuracy of EUS-TA for SPLs ≤10 mm is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of EUS-TA for SPLs ≤10 mm. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 109 patients with SPLs ≤10 mm who underwent EUS-TA. All patients underwent rapid on-site specimen evaluation. Results The median tumor diameter was 8 mm (range, 2.5–10 mm), and the technical success rate was 99.1% (108/109). Adverse events were observed in 3 patients (2.8%). The diagnostic performance was as follows: sensitivity, 90.1% (64/71); specificity, 97.3% (36/37); accuracy, 92.6% (100/108); positive predictive value, 98.5% (64/65); and negative predictive value, 83.7% (36/43). Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of punctures (odds ratio, 7.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.32–37.5; P = 0.023) and tumor type (odds ratio, 11.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.38–102.0; P = 0.024) were independent risk factors for inaccurate EUS-TA results. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-TA for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was 87.5% (14/16). No EUS-TA–related needle-tract seeding was observed in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma during the observation period. Conclusions EUS-TA for SPLs ≤10 mm showed adequate diagnostic accuracy and was safe for use with rapid on-site specimen evaluation in all cases.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3