Depth of anesthesia monitoring: an argument for its use for patient safety

Author:

Brook Karolina12,Agarwala Aalok V.34,Li Fenghua5,Purdon Patrick L.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center

2. Department of Anesthesiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital

4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

5. Department of Anesthesiology, Norton College of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York

6. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA

Abstract

Purpose of review There have been significant advancements in depth of anesthesia (DoA) technology. The Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation recently published recommendations to use a DoA monitor in specific patient populations receiving general anesthesia. However, the universal use of DoA monitoring is not yet accepted. This review explores the current state of DoA monitors and their potential impact on patient safety. Recent findings We reviewed the current evidence for using a DoA monitor and its potential role in preventing awareness and preserving brain health by decreasing the incidence of postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction or decline (POCD). We also explored the evidence for use of DoA monitors in improving postoperative clinical indicators such as organ dysfunction, mortality and length of stay. We discuss the use of DoA monitoring in the pediatric population, as well as highlight the current limitations of DoA monitoring and the path forward. Summary There is evidence that DoA monitoring may decrease the incidence of awareness, postoperative delirium, POCD and improve several postoperative outcomes. In children, DoA monitoring may decrease the incidence of awareness and emergence delirium, but long-term effects are unknown. While there are key limitations to DoA monitoring technology, we argue that DoA monitoring shows great promise in improving patient safety in most, if not all anesthetic populations.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference93 articles.

1. APSF-Endorsed Statement on Revising Recommendations for Patient Monitoring During Anesthesia;Anesth Patient Saf Found,2022

2. World Health Organization-World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WHO-WFSA) International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia;Gelb;Anesth Analg,2018

3. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2021: guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists;Klein;Anaesthesia,2021

4. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia;Rampil;Anesthesiology,1998

5. Update on bispectral index monitoring;Johansen;Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3