Affiliation:
1. University of Utah Health, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
2. Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA
Abstract
Purpose of review
Pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) have been championed as multidisciplinary facilities specializing in the care of pediatric trauma, the leading cause of childhood mortality in the United States.1 However, the vast majority of pediatric trauma is still seen in trauma centers focused on treating adults. This article reviews the latest evidence comparing the relative strengths of PTCs and adult trauma centers (ATCs) in treating childhood injury.
Recent findings
Recent multicenter studies comparing outcomes of pediatric injury in PTCs and ATCs have found no differences in mortality or hospital length of stay, contradicting earlier findings. However, fewer invasive procedures and CT scans were performed at PTCs, and more children were discharged back to their homes.
Summary
It is difficult to demonstrate a difference in outcomes for children treated at PTCs vs. ATCs. However, PTCs do offer a multidisciplinary, nuanced approach to pediatric trauma care, which may result in long term benefits and offer opportunities for regional collaboration.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Reference19 articles.
1. Pediatric mortality at pediatric versus adult trauma centers;Khalil;J Emerg Trauma Shock,2021
2. Paediatric head injury: incidence, aetiology and management;Lam;Paediatr Anaesth,1999
3. Critical care management of severe paediatric trauma: a challenge for anaesthesiologists;Meyer;Paediatr Anaesth,1999
4. Perioperative anesthetic management of pediatric trauma;Rasmussen;Anesthesiol Clin N Am,1999
5. Pediatric trauma anesthesia;Schmitz;Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2002
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献