Author:
Choi Yelim,Jeong Yun Soo,Hwang Jang Soon,Kim Hyo-Cheol,Chung Jin Wook,Choi Jin Woo
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential implications of fusion imaging with C-arm computed tomography (CACT) scans for repetitive conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Materials and Methods
Fifty-six cTACE sessions were performed using fusion CACT images from September 2020 to June 2021 in a tertiary referral center, and the data were retrospectively analyzed. Fusion of unenhanced and enhanced CACT images was considered when previously accumulated iodized oil hampered the identification of local tumor progression or intrahepatic distant metastasis (indication A), when a tumor was supplied by multiple arteries with different origins from the aorta and missing tumor enhancement was suspected (indication B), or when iodized oil distribution on immediate post-cTACE CACT images needed to be precisely compared with the pre-cTACE images (indication C). Fusion image quality, initial tumor response, time to local progression (TTLP) of index tumors, and time to progression (TTP) were evaluated.
Results
The fusion quality was satisfactory with a mean misregistration distance of 1.4 mm. For the 40 patients with indication A, the initial tumor responses at 3 months were nonviable, equivocal, and viable in 27 (67.5%), 4 (10.0%), and 9 (22.5%) index tumors, respectively. The median TTLP and TTP were 14.8 months and 4.5 months, respectively. For 10 patients with indication B, the median TTLP and TTP were 8.3 months and 2.6 months, respectively. Among the 6 patients with indication C, 2 patients were additionally treated at the same cTACE session after confirming incomplete iodized oil uptake on fusion imaging.
Conclusions
Fusion CACT images are useful in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing repetitive cTACE.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging