Combination Use of Compressed Sensing and Deep Learning for Shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Various Sequences

Author:

Shiraishi Kaori1,Nakaura Takeshi1,Uetani Hiroyuki1,Nagayama Yasunori1,Kidoh Masafumi1,Kobayashi Naoki1,Morita Kosuke2,Yamahita Yuichi3,Miyamoto Takeshi4,Hirai Toshinori1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University

2. Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto

3. Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Kawasaki-shi

4. Department of Orthopaedicsurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

Abstract

Objective For compressed sensing (CS) to become widely used in routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is essential to improve image quality. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of combining CS and deep learning–based reconstruction (DLR) for various sequences in shoulder MRI. Methods This retrospective study included 37 consecutive patients who underwent undersampled shoulder MRIs, including T1-weighted (T1WI), T2-weighted (T2WI), and fat-saturation T2-weighted (FS-T2WI) images. Images were reconstructed using the conventional wavelet-based denoising method (wavelet method) and a combination of wavelet and DLR-based denoising methods (hybrid-DLR method) for each sequence. The signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of the bone, muscle, and fat and the full width at half maximum of the shoulder joint were compared between the 2 image types. In addition, 2 board-certified radiologists scored the image noise, contrast, sharpness, artifacts, and overall image quality of the 2 image types on a 4-point scale. Results The signal-to-noise ratios and contrast-to-noise ratios of the bone, muscle, and fat in T1WI, T2WI, and FS-T2WI obtained from the hybrid-DLR method were significantly higher than those of the conventional wavelet method (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the full width at half maximum of the shoulder joint in any of the sequences (P > 0.05). Furthermore, in all sequences, the mean scores of the image noise, sharpness, artifacts, and overall image quality were significantly higher in the hybrid-DLR method than in the wavelet method (P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in contrast among the sequences (P > 0.05). Conclusions The DLR denoising method can improve the image quality of CS in T1-weighted images, T2-weighted images, and fat-saturation T2-weighted images of the shoulder compared with the wavelet denoising method alone.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3