Potential Approach to Quantifying the Volume of the Ischemic Core in Truncated Computed Tomography Perfusion Scans: A Preliminary Study

Author:

Xu Xiao-Quan1,Cao Lin-Li2,Ma Gao1,Shen Guang-Chen1,Lu Shan-Shan1,Zhang Ya-Xi3,Zhang Yu3,Shi Hai-Bin4,Liu Sheng4,Wu Fei-Yun1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

2. Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangsu Second Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing

3. Shukun Network Technology, Co, Ltd, Beijing

4. Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to provide an alternative approach for quantifying the volume of the ischemic core (IC) if truncation of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) occurs in clinical practice. Methods Baseline CTP and follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data from 88 patients with stroke were retrospectively collected. CTP source images (CTPSI) from the unenhanced phase to the peak arterial phase (CTPSI-A) or the peak venous phase (CTPSI-V) were collected to simulate the truncation of CTP in the arterial or venous phases, respectively. The volume of IC on CTPSI-A (VCTPSI-A) or CTPSI-V (VCTPSI-V) was defined as the volume of the brain tissue with >65% reduction in attenuation compared with that of the normal tissue. The volume of IC on the baseline CTP (VCTP) was defined as a relative cerebral blood flow of <30% of that in the normal tissue. The volume of the posttreatment infarct on the follow-up DWI (VDWI) image was manually delineated and calculated. One-way analysis of variance, Bland-Altman plots, and Spearman correlation analyses were used for the statistical analysis. Results VCTPSI-A was significantly higher than VDWI (P < 0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between VCTP and VDWI (P = 0.073) or between VCTPSI-V and VDWI (P > 0.999). The mean differences between VDWI and VCTPSI-V, VDWI and VCTP, and VDWI and VCTPSI-A were 1.70 mL (limits of agreement [LoA], −56.40 to 59.70), 8.30 mL (LoA, −40.70 to 57.30), and −68.10 mL (LoA, −180.90 to 44.70), respectively. Significant correlations were observed between VDWI and VCTP (r = 0.68, P < 0.001) and between VDWI and VCTPSI-V (r = 0.39, P < 0.001); however, no significant correlation was observed between VDWI and VCTPSI-A (r = 0.20, P = 0.068). Conclusions VCTPSI-V may be a promising method for quantifying the volume of the IC if truncation of CTP occurs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3