Effect of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on Image Quality of Chest Computed Tomography for COVID-19 Pneumonia

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to compare the image quality of chest computed tomography (CT) scans for COVID-19 pneumonia using forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution-LUNG (FIRST-LUNG) with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). Method The CT images of 44 inpatients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia between December 2022 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The CT images were reconstructed using FBP, HIR, and FIRST-LUNG-MILD/STANDARD/STRONG. The CT values and noise of the lumen of the main trachea and erector spine muscle were measured for each group. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Subjective evaluations included overall image quality, noise, streak artifact, visualization of normal lung structures, and abnormal CT features. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the objective and subjective indicators among the five groups. The task-based transfer function was derived for three distinct contrasts representing anatomical structures, lower-contrast lesion, and higher-contrast lesion. Results The results of the study demonstrated significant differences in image noise, SNR, and CNR among the five groups (P < 0.001). The FBP images exhibited the highest levels of noise and the lowest SNR and CNR among the five groups (P < 0.001). When compared to the FBP and HIR groups, the noise was lower in the FIRST-LUNG-MILD/STANDARD/STRONG group, while the SNR and CNR were higher (P < 0.001). The subjective overall image quality score of FIRST-LUNG-MILD/STANDARD was significantly better than FBP and FIRST-LUNG-STRONG (P < 0.001). FIRST-LUNG-MILD was superior to FBP, HIR, FIRST-LUNG-STANDARD, and FIRST-LUNG-STRONG in visualizing proximal and peripheral bronchovascular and subpleural vessels (P < 0.05). Additionally, FIRST-LUNG-MILD achieved the best scores in evaluating abnormal lung structure (P < 0.001). The overall interobserver agreement was substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.891). The task-based transfer function 50% values of FIRST reconstructions are consistently higher compared to FBP and HIR. Conclusions The FIRST-LUNG-MILD/STANDARD algorithm can enhance the image quality of chest CT in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, while preserving important details of the lesions, better than the FBP and HIR algorithms. After evaluating various COVID-19 pneumonia lesions and considering the improvement in image quality, we recommend using the FIRST-LUNG-MILD reconstruction for diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia.