Urinary Incontinence in Primary Care—The Gap Between Recommendations and Real World

Author:

Geynisman-Tan Julia1,Cherupally Manisha2,Alexandria Shaina J.3,Brown Tiffany2,Collins Sarah4,Mathews Ashley5,Pedamallu Havisha5,Kenton Kimberly S.6,Persell Stephen D.

Affiliation:

1. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University

2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University

3. Department of Preventive Medicine (Biostatistics), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston

4. Section of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago

5. Northwestern University, Evanston

6. Section Chief of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery and Vice Chair of Research, University of Chicago, Chicago

Abstract

Importance Routine screening for urinary incontinence (UI) by primary care providers (PCPs) is recommended. Objectives We aimed to describe the rate of incident UI diagnosed at annual PCP visits, the prevalence of UI in a large primary care population, and estimate the rate of screening for UI during primary care preventive and annual wellness visits. Secondary aims were to describe PCP knowledge and behavior as they relate to UI screening and diagnosis. Study Design The electronic health record was used to abstract the number of adult female patients seen by PCPs within a regional health system with a diagnosis of UI before our study period and with a new diagnosis over a 2-year period. Additional new diagnoses and screening practices were found on chart review of an additional 824 representative charts. Primary care providers within the health system were surveyed about their screening practices and knowledge about UI. Results There were 192,053 women primary care patients seen over 2 years. A total of 5.7% had a UI diagnosis preceding the study period and 3.4% had a UI diagnosis during the study period. A total of 42% of PCPs reported that they screen for UI at least half the time and none were completely satisfied with their ability to screen for UI. Sixteen percent of annual wellness visits had any documentation of screening for UI. Conclusion In a large primary care population, screening for and detection of UI in women was low.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3