Urinary Incontinence Care-Seeking Barriers Among Latina Patients: What Are We Missing?

Author:

Pancheshnikov Anna1,Harrington Bryna J.2,Handa Victoria L.1,Yanes Liz I.3,Le Neveu Margot2,Voegtline Kristin M.,Olson Sarah B.4,Blomquist Joan L.5,Jacobs Stephanie5,Patterson Danielle1,Chen Chi Chiung Grace1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

3. Universidad Iberoamericana UNIBE, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

4. Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Data Management (BEAD) Core, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

5. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, MD

Abstract

Importance The Latina population is the largest growing ethnic group in the United States with high levels of health disparities in urinary incontinence (UI) treatment and complications rates, which may be due to disproportionately high barriers to UI care-seeking among Latinas. Objectives The objectives of this study were to compare barriers to UI care-seeking among Latina, non-Latina Black, and non-Latina White patients by utilizing the Barriers to Incontinence Care Seeking Questionnaire (BICS-Q) total scores, and to compare specific barriers utilizing BICS-Q subscales. Study Design In this cross-sectional study, patients accessing primary care were recruited to complete the BICS-Q, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form, and Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire–Urinary Incontinence. The BICS-Q total and subscale scores were compared among ethnic/racial groups. Results A total of 298 patients were included in the study with 83 Black, 144 Latina, and 71 White participants per self-identified ethnicity/race. The total BICS-Q score was highest for Latina participants, followed by White and Black participants (11.2 vs 8.2 vs 4.9, respectively, P < 0.0001). Latina participants had significantly higher BICS-Q subscale scores compared with Black participants with no significant differences between Latina and White participants. After controlling for potential confounders, Latina ethnicity/race was still associated with a higher BICS-Q score when compared to Black ethnicity/race (P = 0.0077), and lower Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire–Urinary Incontinence scores remained independently associated with higher BICS-Q scores (P = 0.0078). Conclusions In our study population, Latina patients and patients with lower UI knowledge experience higher barriers to UI care-seeking compared with Black patients and patients with higher UI knowledge. Addressing these barriers may increase care-seeking and improve health equity in the field.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3