Understanding the Pursuit of Third-Line Therapies for Overactive Bladder: A Mixed Methods Study

Author:

Gonzalez Javier D.1,Martin Leigh1,Osmundsen Blake2,Garg Bharti1,Gregory W. Thomas1,Cichowski Sara1

Affiliation:

1. Oregon Health and Science University

2. Legacy Health System, Portland, OR.

Abstract

Importance Overactive bladder (OAB) affects millions of women in the United States, with negative effects in multiple domains that have an impact on quality of life. Third-line therapies for OAB are as effective or superior to lifestyle/behavior modification and medical management, yet few women access these treatments and often spend more than 36 months to reach these treatments after starting medication. Factors associated with time to reach third-line therapy are not well studied, and little is known about how patients progress through care pathways for OAB. Objectives The aim of the study was to determine factors associated with the time spent between second- and third-line therapy for OAB at an academic urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery practice. We sought to identify demographic, treatment, clinical factors, and themes in barriers to receiving treatment for OAB. Study Design This was a mixed methods study consisting of a retrospective cohort study followed by qualitative key informant interviews. Results Eighty-five total participants were included in the analysis, and 42 (49.5%) spent more than 36 months between initiation of medical management and initial third-line therapy for OAB. No significant (P > 0.05) demographic, clinical, or treatment differences were found between groups. Facilitators and obstacles to receiving third-line therapy were identified among key informants, and a treatment decision framework was developed. Conclusions Women often spend more than 36 months to pursue third-line therapy for OAB. Existing objective variables are poor predictors of pursuit of third-line treatment, and leveraging known facilitators and obstacles can be used to develop improved care pathways for OAB.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3