Retropubic Versus Transobturator Midurethral Slings at Time of Colpocleisis

Abstract

Importance This study aimed to evaluate if there is a difference between outcomes when retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery is performed at the time of colpocleisis. Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of the retropubic midurethral sling (RP-MUS) versus the transobturator midurethral sling (TO-MUS) in women who underwent concomitant colpocleisis, specifically 2-year MUS failure and 1-year lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs). A secondary aim was to identify factors associated with these surgical outcomes. Study Design All cases of concomitant MUS and colpocleisis within a closed, integrated health care delivery system were reviewed between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2020. Postoperative MUS failure was defined as (1) postoperative stress urinary incontinence symptoms and/or (2) additional anti-incontinence surgery. Postoperative LUTSs were defined as (1) MUS lysis and/or (2) overactive bladder requiring management with a new treatment. Results Of the 558 women included, 454 (81%) received RP-MUS and 104 (19%) received TO-MUS. Cohort demographics were similar. Neither MUS failure (7% RP-MUS and 9% TO-MUS, P = 0.450) nor LUTSs (7% RP-MUS and 12% TO-MUS, P = 0.171) were significantly different between RP-MUS and TO-MUS. In multivariable analysis, age was found to be significantly associated with LUTSs (odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.09–0.93, P = 0.038 among 70–74-year-olds; odds ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.09–0.83, P = 0.022 among 75–79-year-olds). Conclusions At the time of colpocleisis, both RP-MUS and TO-MUS were highly successful and associated with a low incidence of LUTSs, including MUS lysis. The findings of this large study support RP-MUS and TO-MUS as similarly effective anti-incontinence options at time of colpocleisis.