Suture-Needle Management Device and Novel Port Configuration for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

Author:

Das Deepanjana1,Squires Natalie1,Mueller Margaret2,Collins Sarah2,Lewicky-Gaupp Christina2,Bretschneider C. Emi1,Geynisman-Tan Julia1,Kenton Kimberly2

Affiliation:

1. Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

2. Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Abstract

Importance Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is a commonly performed procedure for the repair of apical pelvic organ prolapse; therefore, novel devices and techniques to improve safety and efficacy of this procedure should be explored. Objective The objective of this study was to assess safety and efficacy of 8-mm trocar site for use of a disposable suture/needle management device (StitchKit; Origami Surgical, Madison, NJ) for robot-assisted SCP with a 4-arm configuration and no assistant port. Study Design This is a retrospective case series of patients undergoing robot-assisted SCP at a tertiary center from 2018 to 2021. All surgical procedures were performed using four 8-mm robotic trocars and StitchKit device. Our objective was to review all cases in which this technique was used to determine whether the approach resulted in a safely completed procedure and any complications or adverse events. Secondary objectives were to describe patient and operative characteristics. Results In total, 422 patients underwent robot-assisted SCP for pelvic organ prolapse. The mean age was 60 ± 10 years, and mean body mass index was 27 ± 6 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Most patients had stage 3 prolapse (73%) and underwent concomitant hysterectomy (70%). Ninety-nine percent (n = 416) of cases were completed robotically. StitchKit was successfully inserted and removed in all robotic cases with correct needle counts. All patients had postoperative visits, and 80% followed up at 3 months. No umbilical/port site hernias, operative site infections, or adverse events were reported. Conclusions Robot-assisted SCP can be performed safely using a 4-arm robotic configuration and suture kit device. This setup eliminates incisions greater than 8 mm and an assistant port, allowing for surgical efficiency without compromising patient outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference10 articles.

1. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013

2. A national contemporary analysis of perioperative outcomes of open versus minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy;J Urol,2018

3. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes;Urology,2012

4. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005

5. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial;Obstet Gynecol,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3