Radial and ulnar forearm free flaps: A critical comparison of donor site morbidity and its impact on quality of life

Abstract

Background: A poor evidence basis exists regarding direct comparing objective and subjective donor site morbidity associated with forearm flap. The authors evaluated the postoperative donor-site complications and quality of life outcomes between radial forearm free flap (RFFF) and ulnar forearm free flap (UFFF). Methods: All patients undergoing RFFF or UFFF harvest were included. Grip strength, pinch strength, wrist range of movement, and testing skin sensitivity were assessed with the appropriate scales at different time intervals. In addition, cosmetic and quality of life were assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled (40 RFFF and 40 UFFF). The results showed a short-term reduction in grip strength, fine motor skills (tip pinch, key pinch, palmar pinch), and range of motion was observed for RFFF and improved over time. None of the patients in either group experienced functional disturbance in grip strength, wrist motion, fine motor skills, or sensation to light touch at 1 year. Nine patients experienced partial skin graft loss (RFFF = 6; UFFF = 3). There was a significantly higher incidence of temporary numbness in the RFFF group (p=0.040). Persistent numbness occurred in 3 cases in RFFF. Cold intolerance was significantly lower in UFFF (2.5 %) than in RFFF (22.5%). Moreover, the mean POSAS and DASH score reduced at 12 months compared to 6 months, significantly superior for UFFF. Conclusion: Objective function limitations are reversible short-term effects after forearm flap and do not affect daily routines in the long term. Additionally, UFFF appears to be preferred over RFFF for subjective outcomes, which emphasizes the UFFF should be considered an alternative to RFFF for reconstructing soft-tissue defects.