Assessing Scar Outcomes Using Objective Scar Measurement Tools: An Adjunct to Validated Scar Evaluation Scales

Abstract

Intro: The assessment of scar outcomes is important to both patient care and research focused on understanding the results of medical and surgical interventions. The Vancouver Scar Scale and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale are validated and simple instruments to assess scars. However, these subjective scales have shortcomings. The VSS fails to capture patient perception and has indeterminate validity and reliability. The POSAS captures patient perception, but the observer scale has been shown to have moderate amounts of inter-rater variability. Studies highlighting the ability of objective scar assessment tools to produce reliable and reproducible results are needed. In this study, we aimed to validate the use of the Fibrometer ®, Elastimeter ®, and SkinColorCatch ® as an objective adjunct in the assessment of hypertrophic scar and keloid outcomes. Methods: This was a prospective single-center study which assessed patient scars using the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment scale, and the aforementioned objective study tools. Correlations between the different methods of scar assessment were measured. Results: The Fibrometer ® and SkinColorCatch ® showed significant correlations with the VSS total and the Observer POSAS total. The Elastimeter ® showed significant correlations with both the Patient and Observer POSAS totals. Unexpected correlations between Elastimeter ® measurements and the vascularity/pigmentation of scars indicate that scoring of these categories may be influenced by how severe the scar looks to the observer subjectively, further necessitating the need for reliable objective scar assessment tools. Conclusion: These results highlight the ability of these devices to assess scars and demonstrate their potential in serving as an important adjunct to previously validated scar assessment scales.